Mar 30, 2013

Paradox of plenty: India's problem is how to manage food surplus. And ensure millions don't go to bed hungry.



A typical wheat mandi in India. While arrivals are heavy, no place to keep these stocks. 

Nothing can explain this strange and criminal paradox of plenty. More than 45 years after Green Revolution began; India provides a unique spectre of overflowing godowns and rotting grains on the one hand while millions go to bed hungry. Having the largest population of hungry in the world, India ranks 66 among 105 countries in the 2012 Global Hunger Index. That too at a time when there is no shortage of food within the country.

To get rid of the huge stocks, India has aggressively resorted to food exports. While rice exports have touched 10 million tonnes, making India the world’s biggest rice exporter, close to 9.5 million tonnes of wheat has also been exported this fiscal. And yet, grain stocks remain unmanageable.

With over 44 million tonnes of wheat expected to be procured once the procurement season begins officially from April, India will be saddled with a massive and unprecedented food grain (rice and wheat) stock of over 100 million tonnes. Already, as on March 1, Food Corporation of India was holding 62.8 million tonnes of grains – 27.1 million tonnes of wheat and 35.7 million tonnes of rice – good enough to meet the country’s food requirement for another year. Storing an additional 44 million tonnes is simply going to be a nightmare. While the all-time high production and procurement is a historic milestone, it provides an equally daunting task for the government agencies to store it, and store it safely.

“We are looking for space in sugar mills, yards and even in rice mills. It’s going to be very tough,” a visibly worried D S Grewal, principal secretary in Punjab’s food and civil supplies department, told a newspaper. Against an expectation of 14 million tonnes of wheat to be purchased, Punjab has space to keep only 6 million tonnes. Although Punjab has a total food storage space for 23 million tonnes, including 12 million tonnes on open plinths, the grain silos are bursting at the seams with food stocks from the purchases made in the previous year’s lying in the open. 

In Madhya Pradesh, fast emerging as the next wheat bowl of the country, there is space only for about 50 per cent of the expected 13 million tonnes that is likely to be procured by official agencies. “We are looking at even school premises and some government buildings for stocking wheat. We have no other option,” said a senior state official. Since wheat harvests begin early in central India, procurement is already in full swing in over 2,770 purchase centres that have been set up in the state. Not only Punjab and Madhya Pradesh, heavy arrivals are expected from Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan and Bihar.

Nothing can explain this gross food mismanagement. For almost 30 years now, successive governments have failed to accord any priority to food storage and distribution. As early as in 1979, under a ‘grow more food’ campaign launched by the Ministry of Food and Civil Supplies, the need for setting up 50 grain silos across the country was envisaged. The underlying objective was to reduce the burden for stock holding of wheat by the producing states by building a network of grain storage capacity across the country, which would also be used for effective distribution among the poor.

It’s all a question of priority. Food has never been on the top of the national agenda. In the past few years, the UPA has made massive investment in building 250,000 panchayat ghars. These panchayat structures have been provided with a computer link-up and are also being dotted with solar power. Isn’t it strange that while the government has the resources to build panchayat ghars, it has no money to construct warehouses across the country? Still worse, since 2004-05, UPA has doled out Rs 32 lakh-crore by way of tax exemptions to the Corporate, trade and business. These exemptions are clubbed under the category ‘revenue foregone’ in the budget documents. For 2013-14, the ‘revenue foregone’ is Rs 5.73 lakh crore.

The entire food production and distribution system therefore needs an urgent overhaul. If only the government was to focus on agricultural production, procurement and distribution in a decentralized manner, much of the agrarian crisis would disappear. Also, no country can claim to be a super power with millions living in hunger. Therefor the need is to follow a three-pronged approach:

1) Set up a wide network of mandis and temporary purchase centers across Bihar, eastern Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Odisha, Assam and the other northeastern states. Extending the Green Revolution to northeast has already increases rice production, but farmers are resorting to distress sale getting about 20 to 30 per cent less because of the absence of procurement centers. 

2) Madhya Pradesh has shown that providing a bonus of Rs 150 per quintal over the procurement price of Rs 1350 a quintal has provided an incentive to farmers to produce more. A higher minimum support price for wheat and rice, and also extending it to pulses, millets and fodder would shift focus to other crops essential for maintaining nutritional security.

3) At least Rs 1 lakh crore be taken out of the ‘revenue foregone’ category, and invested in setting up a network of grain silos, warehouses and godowns across 50 places spread throughout the country. All this is doable provided food is accorded utmost priority in national thinking and planning.    

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dear Devinder,
Great report. But it raises one question. Why has storage facilities buildup been so poor? It seems to be as bad or worse in India as in Pakistan. Most important, what about the hungry poverty-stricken who don't have money to buy food, or not enough? Is there no governmental charitable system to distribute poor to the destitute? Don't they have a right to food, even though bad planning is responsible for non-creation of livelihoods and income to survive on?
Warmest regards,

Najma
Karachi

Ramesh Dubey said...

आदरणीय देवेंद्र जी आपने गेहूं (हरित नहीं) क्रांति की विकृतियों का विश्‍लेषण करते हुए कई बातें छोड़ दी। सरकारी कृषि खरीद केंद्र, गोदाम, विकेंद्रित अनाज भंडारण व्‍यवस्‍था आज की जरूरत हैं लेकिन गेहूं का समर्थन मूल्‍य बढ़ाने की नहीं घटाने की जरूरत है। आज पंजाब-हरियाणा का गेहूं तमिलनाडु, आंध्र प्रदेश जाता है और वह भी आयातित डीजल के बल पर। यहां सबसे बड़ा सवाल यह है कि क्‍या हरित क्रांति के पहले दक्षिण भारत के लोग भूखे सोते थे। हरित क्रांति के दौरान जो सुविधाएं गेहूं को मिलीं वही सुविधाएं यदि मोटे अनाजों, तिलहनी, दलहनी फसलों को मिलें तो कुपोषण, भुखमरी, गरीबी, गांवों से पलायन आदि समस्‍याओं का अपने आप समाधान हो जाएगा। इतना ही नहीं भोजन की थाली विविधतापूर्ण होते ही कैंसर, डाइबिटीज, हृदयाघात से भी एक बड़ी सीमा तक मुक्‍ति मिल जाएगी। दुर्भाग्‍यवश देश के अदूरदर्शी कृषि वैज्ञानिकों, सरकारों की भांति आप भी गेहूं के मोहपाश से पूरी तरह नहीं निकल पाए हैं।